Careers in Anesthesia are Changing, with Opportunities Outside Hospitals
Careers in anesthesia treating non-hospital patients is at the cutting edge of technique and skill while offering greater work-life balance.
The hunt for savings in the U.S. healthcare system is seemingly-endless and the quarry elusive. Public opinions polls conducted by Harvard reveal that the majority of Americans believe that the cost of healthcare services and drugs are excessive. And polling done by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that roughly half of U.S. adults have difficulty managing medical expenses. While this affects the uninsured predominately, nearly a third of insured Americans are feeling the heat as well. That means necessary care and medications are often beyond access, endangering lives and further burdening the healthcare system.
It would seem then that novel approaches with clear, demonstrable savings and few apparent downsides would be quickly recognized and adopted. But, that’s not always the case. Sometimes, even with solid data and anecdotal evidence to prove a new methodology works and pays off in dividends, what is needed is an evangelist.
Dr. Marlon Michel is a board-certified anesthesiologist and the founder of M2 Anesthesia, a practice that operates in Washington and Oregon specializing in office-based anesthesia for pediatric dental procedures. He is one of the first anesthesiologists in this specialization, which arose from a need being unmet by the anesthesiology establishment in Washington.
“Let’s say you’re a pediatric dentist and you realize that a kid needs anesthesia because they’re uncooperative,” Michel explains. “Well, you can only give nitrous in the office. So, some of the pediatric dentists asked anesthesiologists to come into the office and put these kids to sleep, and the MD anesthesiologists claimed that they didn’t have the time in their schedules.”
While some pediatric dentists at the time undertook anesthesiology training to become dentist anesthetists, many were forced to move cases that required anesthesia to hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs.) But moving the cases to hospitals and ASCs came with copious added expenses. It wasn’t long before Washington Medicaid officials realized that keeping pediatric cases in dental’ offices and utilizing ambulatory anesthesiology services would present an overall savings.
With Washington’s single Medicaid organization onboard, pediatric dentists and anesthesiologists had a model that was efficient for providers and patients all the while saving the system from unneeded costs.
But, across the southern border in Oregon, where many of Michel’s dental clients had or still practiced, there was an identical need, but a vastly different system of Medicaid implementation.
There, a patchwork of coordinated care organizations (CCOs) oversaw the implementation of Medicaid on a regional level. As Michel remembers, at the time he entered the Oregon market, around 16 CCOs covered an area encompassing approximately three to four counties.
“I went to each of the CCOs and told them that we provided dentists with safe, in-office anesthesiology for pediatric cases and asked if they had considered allowing it,” says Michel. “Initially, I met resistance. They were all skittish; they thought that it was too dangerous to put a patient under general anesthesia outside of a hospital or surgery center. But I reiterated that we did it safely, time and time again, just two miles north of the border, so why not here.”
Armed with strong evidence – and offering a generous introductory rate – Michel soon convinced a few of the CCOs to adopt the office-based model. In addition to a revenue stream, he gained further data proving the safety and efficacy of anesthesia administered in the office, the reduced total cost for payers, and the comfort and convenience afforded to patients and providers before, during, and after procedures.
Word spread quickly among the CCOs, and soon Marlon presented his model for in-office anesthesia to operating managers, chief medical officers, and even his fellow anesthesiologists. Anticipated hesitancy – a norm in healthcare when a new mode of operation arises that challenges the status quo – gave way to guarded enthusiasm. Before long, 90% of the Oregon CCOs went from requiring procedures involving anesthesia be performed in hospitals or ASCs to requiring anesthesiologists to facilitate cases in the office when appropriate. Dentists, many of whom had before never considered the option, were overwhelmingly onboard with this change, as it meant reduced travel and the opportunity to perform more procedures in a day.
Another benefit: anesthesiologists are, by definition, physicians. In most cases, in order to get Medicaid to approve a procedure – dental or not – that will be performed under anesthesia, a physician needs to perform a physical beforehand. Normally, for pediatric dental procedures that are being performed in the hospital, this would be undertaken by the patient’s pediatrician, adding yet another layer of cost. But, as an anesthesiology practice, M2 is able to offer yet another saving to the system by performing the physical assessment themselves.
Even despite the clear advantages office-based anesthesia presents, Michel has faced some pushback. Caution and trepidation are not without merit in healthcare, but he is able to counter those who have their doubts. He says the key is to prove out the strengths in three areas: safety, accessibility, and affordability.
“We tick every one of those boxes,” says Michel. “We can do it efficiently because our turnovers are three minutes versus an hour at the hospital. We’ve proven we can do it safely. And, we can service more patients, which ultimately leads to increased access and savings.“
Careers in anesthesia treating non-hospital patients is at the cutting edge of technique and skill while offering greater work-life balance.
With a nursing burnout crisis not looming, but here, what role can office-based procedures play in reducing stress?
Mobile Anesthesiologists' Dr. Heike Knorpp shares her insights on trust in the physician-patient relationship and how office-based procedures can impact that.
Alarms have long been sounding about the looming physician burnout crisis facing healthcare and the nation at-large. The pandemic only intensified feelings of depression, depersonalization, lack of professional satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. The American Medical Association recent reported on findings of a Mayo Clinic study that found during the Omicron wave of the pandemic, a...
Expanding - not disrupting - sites of service broadens access while bringing down overall costs.
Dr. BobbieJean Sweitzer, past president of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesiology (SAMBA), shares her insights on where the field is going
Dr. David Mayer shares insights into how critical protocols and safeguards can ensure office-based procedures and patient safety align.
Moving procedures into the office setting checks all the boxes when it comes to the quadruple aim.
Cost transparency benefits patients, providers, and payers, so why is the industry so averse to it? Tina Mentz share her thoughts on the importance of sunlight in healthcare spending.
Health systems need to differentiate from new players offering easier access and lower costs. Office-based procedures could be the key.
Office-based procedures have a proven track record of safety and myriad benefits for urologists, patients, and payers alike.
Office-based procedures are growing in popularity as a way for independent practices to grow. So what are the benefits and key considerations physicians must make to safely bring procedures into their own space?
Armed with a commonsense approach to lowering healthcare costs, anesthesiologist Dr. Marlon Michel is safely, conveniently, and comfortable helping dentists shift their sites-of-service.
More-and-more, medical procedures are being performed safely, conveniently, and affordably in physician's offices and clinics.
Today's post is part III of our ongoing series about moving procedures out of the hospital and into ambulatory surgery center and office-based environments. Today, we're discussing changing patient demographics and market signals.
Today's post is part II of our ongoing series about moving procedures out of the hospital and into ambulatory surgery center and office-based environments. We're discussing the contributing factors to the site of service shift, and its benefits to patients and doctors alike. Last week, we covered advances in surgical procedures and anesthesia. This time, we're addressing the rise of office healthcare technology.
Reason #1: ADVANCES IN ANESTHESIA AND SURGICAL PROCEDURES The modernization of anesthesia, particularly outsourced anesthesia, has played a clear role in the site of service transition to office-based procedures. The healthcare industry is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The past decade has seen a steady increase in surgical procedures moving away from hospital environments into surgery...